Capital gains tax (CGT) remains one of the most discussed policy levers in Australia’s housing and investment landscape. With ongoing debate around housing affordability, government budgets, and tax reform, proposed changes to CGT—particularly around investor concessions—continue to surface. For property owners and investors, understanding how these potential changes could impact long-term wealth is critical.
Capital gains tax is the tax applied to the profit made when you sell an asset, including investment property. In Australia, CGT is not a separate tax but forms part of your income tax.
If you’ve held an investment property for more than 12 months, you’re generally eligible for a 50% CGT discount, meaning only half the gain is added to your taxable income.
While no sweeping reforms have been legislated at the time of writing, several recurring proposals have been discussed in government and policy circles:
One of the most widely debated changes is reducing the CGT discount from 50% to potentially 25% for individuals. This would effectively increase the taxable portion of any capital gain.
Some proposals suggest restricting CGT benefits (and negative gearing) to newly constructed properties. The aim is to incentivise new housing supply rather than investment in existing dwellings.
While not directly a CGT change, limiting negative gearing could impact overall investment returns and alter how capital gains are viewed as part of the broader investment strategy.
Historically, proposed changes have included “grandfathering,” meaning existing investments may continue under current rules, while new purchases are subject to updated policies.
The primary drivers behind proposed CGT reforms include:
However, critics argue that reducing investor incentives could decrease rental supply and place upward pressure on rents—particularly in tight markets.
If implemented, changes to CGT could:
The key takeaway: after-tax outcomes matter more than ever.
This is where decisions become less about headlines and more about individual strategy.
Trying to “beat” tax changes often leads to reactive decisions. The better approach is to:
Property remains a long-term asset class. Policy settings will change over time—but well-selected properties in strong locations have historically continued to perform.
Proposed capital gains tax changes are worth paying attention to, but they shouldn’t trigger rushed decisions. For most investors, the fundamentals still matter more: location, demand, supply, and long-term growth.
If you’re unsure where your investment stands in today’s market—or how potential policy changes could impact your position—it’s worth getting a clear, up-to-date review of your property’s value and performance.
By Tye Thies - Toowoomba's leading real estate agent
tye@tomoro.com.au
0408 249 666